How to is the most common way of starting a benefit title. To explore the how to format more deeply check out this post on writing headlines for blog posts. Its applicable to writing presentation titles too. How to write a killer How to article that gets Attention. Promise a story, we love stories. You probably already know that telling stories is a powerful presentation technique.
Wireless Mighty mouse: the best presentation remote
Youll see the same alluring headlines time and time again. Ill show you how this can work by taking one topic and generating a number of possible presentation titles by applying the different formats. The topic is teaching bioethics in secondary schools. I have a good friend whos an expert on this topic and gives presentations at conferences around the world. Promise benefits, dale carnegies famous book, how to win Friends and Influence people is still one of the best-selling communications books on Amazon. The title of the book is a big part of its success. That title works because it promises benefits. Its not enough to say: How to teach bioethics. Adding benefits to the title makes it sing: writing How to teach a bioethics class that makes students think. How to be an inspiring bioethics teacher. How to engage and inspire your students through teaching bioethics.
You might not give much thought to your presentation title for a conference presentation. The conference organizers will have asked you to provide a title and an abstract for the conference programme and you manage to slap something together just before the deadline. But your presentation title can determine whether you have a smattering of word people attending, or standing room only. The good news is that its not that hard to craft a presentation title. There are a number of tried and tested formats which are easy to adapt to your topic. This is the way professional copywriters write headlines. They dont start from scratch. They have a collection of previously used headlines (called a swipefile) and then they simply work out which type of headline will work best for their current topic. Next time youre in the store, check out magazines like cosmo.
Please submit suggestions for conference sessions that. More, cpfo testing Now available Online, exams reviews to qualify for the certified Public Finance Officer (cpfo) designation are now available online. Apply now for gfoa standing Committees. Applications to become a gfoa standing committee member are being accepted through July 27, 2018. More 2017 2018 Budget Award Winners Posted. Gfoa has posted the award winners for both 20 for entities that have received the award as of June 30, 2018. Get inspiration for your presentation title from magazines.
This year's event will take place as a three-part series. Each course is a separate topic (Creating a budget Aligned with Community Priorities, budget Monitoring, and building a better Budget Office) and stand-along session. Register Now for gaap update, registration is open for gfoa's 23rd Annual governmental gaap update web-Stream event. Enjoy all the benefits of the highest quality continuing professional education without the times and expense of travel. Sign up with your colleagues and take advantage of special group rates! Learn More 113th Annual Conference call for Topics. We're working to identify sessions for our 113th Annual Conference in Los Angeles.
55 off DinoFire wireless.4GHz
For this reason, our participating remote viewers have perceived the for 2013 targets along two separate timelines, with each timeline offering the potential for significant differences in future events given specific possible actions taken by the mainstream scientific community. Thus, we are hoping to discern what the future looks like if the mainstream scientific community pursues one policy as compared with a future in which the mainstream scientific community pursues a different policy. In the former case, the policy is a continuation of a current policy. In the latter case, the policy is an alternate policy that might produce a significantly different future. We are attempting to learn if the publication of information about two future timelines based on differences in current policies can change the future that our current now evolves into. The various 2008 targets establish a baseline set of criteria by which the accuracy of the remote-viewing results in general may be evaluated. Thus, if the targets are perceived accurately by the remote viewers participating in the study, then it is reasonable to assume that the results for the future dates for those same targets will be comparably accurate.
Since each geographically determined target is evaluated three times (once in 2008, and twice in 2013 — plot once for each future timeline there are three times as many total targets as there are geographically determined targets in this study. The remote-viewing sessions were conducted prior to the targets being assigned to those sessions by a truly random process (explained in "Experiment Details" below as well as in the "Original Report" video presentation that appears above) that took place on Wednesday, it was not possible. Important Links: Here is where you can find links to the remote-viewing sessions, all decrypted and organized for easy viewing. Here is where you can read about how the experiment was conducted. You can also see all of the support files that were used for this experiment. Sign up for gfoa's 3rd Annual Better Budgeting web-stream event!
Crucially, this research is based on the assumption or theory that there are an infinite number of "parallel" timelines, and that there is no single future for any moment of the "now." Thus, it is not possible to "predict" any single future since there. There are only multiple futures, and we are using this experiment to see if it is useful to find a correspondence or correlation between timelines, as with our perceived timeline and one of the two timelines specified below. The two 2013 timelines examined in this study are. Timeline A:, 12 noon target local time, following the timeline in which the leadership of the mainstream global scientific establishment continues to ignore or deny (1) the reality of the remote-viewing phenomenon, and (2) the existence of life not originating from Earth. Timeline B:, 12 noon target local time, following the timeline in which by the end of 2009 leaders of the mainstream global scientific establishment publicly recognize (1) the reality of the remote-viewing phenomenon, and (2) the existence of life not originating from Earth. The results of this study do suggest that there is a difference between the two timelines.
These data suggest that the impact of planetary change is less severe for Timeline b as compared with Timeline. This suggests that having the mainstream scientific community openly acknowledge the reality of remote viewing and life (even microbial) not originating on Earth may help ameliorate the impact of severe planetary change. The key west target was added late in the study to explore a timeline in which the scientific community recognizes the reality of remote viewing and the existence of extraterrestrial life by 2011. Here are links to some of the data and analyses for the current project. Project Parameter overview for the experiments: The remote viewers participating in this study have remote viewed various geographically determined targets during two time periods: This five-year gap will allow us to look for planetary change that may occur over that period. From our past research we know that the future is probabilistic. Multiple Universes Project.) If multiple realities emerge from every moment of now, then there is no single future timeline. Thus we hope that by specifying certain timeline conditions with our remote-viewing tasking, it is possible to perceive a specific future (for a specific timeline) correctly.
I-clickr Lite (Android.x).0.4 - free download
Extensive loss of buildings near coasts. We do not know with any certitude why the remote-viewing data appear to real show these things. Web site visitors should remember that this is a public experiment, and we hope the public will learn along with us as we complete the experiment. We are pdf not predicting anything with this experiment. We are only looking at the data and comparing it with what actually happens. For this project, all targets are assigned two timelines for the date This allows us to attempt to use remote viewing to describe alternative futures by specifying characteristics of future timelines. Web site visitors who are not familiar with our research into multiple realities might want to view this introductory video presentation on the subject.
Malé International Airport, malé, maldives, kitv building, honolulu, hawaii. The vehicle Assembly building at launch Complex 39, kennedy Space center, merritt Island, Florida. Key west, Florida, in general, nearly all of the remote-viewing perceptions for all targets for the date ppear to correspond with the physical state of those locations for that date. However, the remote viewing perceptions for ppear much different, and they seem to suggest the following types of physical changes across many of the above geographical locations by mid-2013: Impacts from what appear to be large meteors leading to tsunamis and possible volcanism. Extensive and forceful flooding of coastal areas. Excessive solar radiation, storms resume and other severe weather, in terms of the effects of these changes on humans, these data also suggest: Massive self-organized relocation from coastal areas (refugees). The breakdown of rescue or other notable governmental functioning. The breakdown of the food supply system. The breakdown of the vehicular transport system.
is the update of this Climate Project that was published on 16 February 2013 relating to the meteor and asteroid events of mid-February 2013. The graphic/link to the left shows a printed version of this early update. Below is the original Climate Project report published in June 2010. Principal Investigator: courtney brown, remote viewers: hrvg viewers led by Glenn Wheaton and crv viewers led by lyn Buchanan. Overview of Remote-viewing Perceptions for This Project: This project describes change between the years 20cross nine geographical locations with a global spread. Vaitupu, tuvalu, fort Jesus, mombasa kenya, sydney opera house, sydney, australia. Mount Kilimanjaro, tanzania, united States Congress building, washington,.
These speculations cannot be verified by any means known. Nonetheless, some web site visitors may enjoy considering these speculations. We share these speculations with you because learning is supposed to be fun, and the best way to learn is to think "out of the box." Web site visitors are encouraged to watch all of the video reports below. Our web site visitors are reminded that this is research, not certitude. Remember what Albert Einstein once said, "If we knew what we were doing, it wouldn't be called research, would it?" Note that these analyses are the product of the Chief Investigator for this project, courtney brown. Other investigators using different methods of analysis resumes may come to different conclusions. Hrvg and crv methods of analysis in particular tend to be more nuanced than some of the analyses presented below. Below is our Project Summary of the Climate Project. Here (and immediately below) is the Project Summary for the Climate Project.
Top, best, syma rc helicopters, best
About Best Sellers in Office Presentation Remotes. These lists, updated hourly, contain bestselling items. Here you can discover the best Office Presentation Remotes in Amazon Best Sellers, and find the top 100 most popular Amazon Office Presentation Remotes. Farsight's Climate Project, a global Climate Change remote-viewing Study, multiple realities, timelines, and events. Introduction: we at The farsight Institute have just completed a fascinating study using remote viewing to study climate and planetary change between we have published three reports on this project (actually, four, sort of). The original report was published in June 2010. An "Early Update" for the project was released on 16 February 2013. Finally, there are two versions of our "Project Summary published after the closing date for the experiment. The "Official Project Summary" of the project has been published on A second version of this project summary is the "Speculative version of the Project Summary." This speculative version contains speculations by yardage courtney brown regarding a possible use of our Climate Project data to alter.